Dan Murfet, Jesse Hoogland

We study applications of singular learning theory (SLT) to AI safety, with a focus on interpretability and alignment. Ideal candidates come from a strong technical background in mathematics, physics, computer science, or biology, and aren't afraid to get their hands dirty with ML experiments. We don't expect you to have deep expertise in SLT, but a shallow familiarity will help.

Stream overview

We expect to support research projects applying singular learning theory (SLT) to AI safety, especially interpretability and alignment.

We support both empirical projects (e.g., applying Bayesian Influence Functions to study or improve unlearning) and theoretical projects (e.g., proving convergence properties of SGMCMC-based sampling methods). Most projects will involve both components: your specific focus will depend on your background and interests.

On the empirical side, a typical project will involve the following SLT-based tools:

  • Local Learning Coefficients (LLCs) and refined LLCs, which capture model complexity and generalization in singular settings.
  • Susceptibilities, which measure how model components respond to perturbations/distribution shifts.
  • Bayesian Influence Functions (BIFs), which measure how model predictions respond to perturbations/distribution shifts.

With these tools, we investigate diverse areas, such as the following:

  • Developmental interpretability: How do models acquire structure over training?
  • Spectroscopy ("Circuit discovery"): How can we locate which structures are responsible for model generalization?
  • Unlearning: Can we erase structure/knowledge in a targeted way?
  • Emergent misalignment: Can we predict at what fraction of harmful code data we end up with emergent misalignment?
  • Elicitation: Can we design data perturbations that elicit harmful outputs?

Mentors

Daniel Murfet (Dan)
Timaeus
,
Director of Research
SF Bay Area
Interpretability
Theoretical Alignment and Formal Methods
Alignment Training Methods

I was until recently a professional mathematician at the University of Melbourne, where I worked on algebraic geometry, mathematical logic, some aspects of mathematical physics, and most recently statistical learning theory. As of early 2025 I left academia to direct research at Timaeus on AI safety.

Read more
Jesse Hoogland
Timaeus
,
Executive Director
SF Bay Area
Interpretability
Misalignment Science

Jesse is the co-founder and executive director of Timaeus, an AI safety non-profit researching applications of singular learning theory (SLT) to AI safety, particularly for interpretability and alignment. Jesse comes from a background in physics and leads several research projects at Timaeus, in addition to being involved in outreach and operations.

Read more

Mentorship style

The team will meet weekly together with both mentors. Separately, you will meet 1-on-1 with at least one of the mentors every other week. We conduct our asynchronous communications through an internal Discord server. We expect you to schedule additional pair-programming/debugging calls with other people on the team as needed.

We'll help with research obstacles, including outside of meetings.

Fellows we are looking for

If you're interested in working on more of the empirical side, you should have prior experience with ML engineering (at least at the level of a program like ARENA) and prior research experience (potentially in a field outside of ML). A bonus would be prior familiarity with designing and running ML experiments or research specifically in AI safety.

If you're interested in working on more of the theoretical side, you should have prior research experience in a relevant field like mathematics, theoretical physics, or theoretical computer science.

Please make sure that your background and interests are clearly described in your application. By default, we'll be looking for evidence of research ability in the form of publications.

We do not expect you to already be aware of SLT, but if you pass the first round, please prepare by conducting some background reading (see: timaeus.co/learn).

You will most likely be working in a team with 2-4 other people, led by one of this stream's mentors. In some cases, scholars also work on their own or with their own collaborators. 

Project selection

Mentor(s) will talk through project ideas with scholar and suggest several options to choose from.

Streams

The Winter 2027 cohort offers a wide range of research streams led by experts across AI alignment, interpretability, governance, and safety. Each stream provides its own research agenda, methodology, and mentorship focus.

London
Empirical
Interpretability
London
Interpretability, Red-Teaming, Monitoring
London
Monitoring, Adversarial Robustness, Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Dangerous Capability Evals, Safeguards
New York City
Policy and Governance
Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Scalable Oversight, Agent Foundations
SF Bay Area
Empirical
Theory
Dangerous Capability Evals, Adversarial Robustness, Security, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
London
Control, Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring
Washington, D.C.
Policy and Governance
Policy & Governance, Strategy & Forecasting
Oxford
Theory
AI Welfare
SF Bay Area
Control, Model Organisms, Scheming & Deception, Strategy & Forecasting
SF Bay Area
Theory
Interpretability
Tübingen
Dangerous Capability Evals, Agent Foundations, Adversarial Robustness, Monitoring, Scalable Oversight, Scheming & Deception
SF Bay Area
Policy and Governance
Dangerous Capability Evals, Policy & Governance
New York City
Monitoring, Dangerous Capability Evals, Scalable Oversight, Safeguards
SF Bay Area
Policy and Governance
Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance
Montreal
Agent Foundations, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring, Control, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
SF Bay Area
Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Scheming & Deception