Pegah Maham

This stream conducts policy and governance research on "loss-of-control" risks from advanced AI, such as recursive self-improvement and misalignment.

Stream overview

I want to conduct policy and governance research on "loss-of-control" risks (RSI, misalignment etc). As a first step, this probably includes rigorous threat modelling and scenarios. If by the time of the MATS program, sufficient examples have been published, we can continue from there and develop proposals for best practices to assess and mitigate associated risks.

Mentors

Pegah Maham
Google DeepMind
,
Policy Development Manager
SF Bay Area
Policy and Governance
Forecasting and Strategy
AI Systems Security
Technical AI Governance

Pegah Maham is a Policy Development and Strategy Manager within Google DeepMind’s Frontier Policy Development team, where she works at the intersection of technical AI safety and security and international governance. Her work is focused on frontier AI risks, such as biosecurity and AGI safety. Topics she is thinking about include risk assessments and mitigations, threat modelling, external testing, transparency, system integrity and model weight security.

Read more

Mentorship style

We will meet once a week for 30 min, either in person or via a video call. Occasionally, we can have whiteboard brainstorming sessions, depending on my capacity (which is hard to predict.)

Fellows we are looking for

You do not need a STEM or ML background. You should understand how current LLMs are being developed, and understand related concepts such as reinforcement learning or reward hacking. You should be familiar with the existing arguments and counter-arguments around "loss-of-control".

You should bring an interest for the existing policy discourse and environment on this topic; and a willingness to consider feasibility.

Project selection

We will brainstorm and re-fine together, based on policy demand and your interests and expertise.

Streams

The Winter 2026 cohort offers a wide range of research streams led by experts across AI alignment, interpretability, governance, and safety. Each stream provides its own research agenda, methodology, and mentorship focus.

SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals
Boston
Policy and Governance
Adversarial Robustness, Policy & Governance, Red-Teaming, Safeguards
New York City
Control, Scalable Oversight, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Monitoring
SF Bay Area
Policy and Governance
Policy & Governance
SF Bay Area
Control, Monitoring, Dangerous Capability Evals
SF Bay Area
Security, Compute Infrastructure
London
Theory
Interpretability
London
Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Red-Teaming
SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Control, Monitoring
Toronto
Interpretability
London
Control, Monitoring, Safeguards, Dangerous Capability Evals, Scheming & Deception
Chicago
Biorisk, Security, Safeguards
SF Bay Area
Interpretability, Agent Foundations
London
Empirical
Interpretability
London
Interpretability, Red-Teaming, Monitoring
London
Monitoring, Adversarial Robustness, Control, Model Organisms, Red-Teaming, Dangerous Capability Evals, Safeguards
New York City
Policy and Governance
Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Scalable Oversight, Agent Foundations
SF Bay Area
Empirical
Theory
Dangerous Capability Evals, Adversarial Robustness, Security, Red-Teaming, Scalable Oversight
London
Control, Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Monitoring
Washington, D.C.
Policy and Governance
Policy & Governance, Strategy & Forecasting