The Autumn 2026 program will run for 10 weeks in Berkeley, CA and London, UK from September 28th to December 4th. Fellows will receive mentorship from world-class researchers and at organizations like Anthropic, Google DeepMind, OpenAI, Redwood Research, and ARC, with the option to apply for a 6–12 month funded extension beyond the main program. For the first time, we are running Founding & Field-Building and Biosecurity tracks.
Applications are now open. Apply by June 7th.

Key dates for the application and admissions timeline
Applications typically open several months before the program begins. Applicants complete a multi-stage admissions process, beginning with a general application. Depending on the tracks, streams, and mentors they apply to, applicants may also complete additional evaluations such as interviews, work tests, coding assessments, or writing samples before final admissions decisions are made.

The main program is a 10 to 12 week full-time research fellowship. Fellows work closely with one or more mentors on independent research projects while participating in workshops, talks, office hours, and the broader MATS community. Research directions are developed collaboratively with mentors, with increasing independence throughout the program.
The extension phase typically begins approximately two weeks after the main program concludes. Fellows who demonstrate strong research potential during the main program may apply for a funded 6 to 12 month extension. Extension fellows continue developing independent research with ongoing mentorship and support, typically working from MATS offices or other approved research locations. In recent cohorts, roughly 80% of fellows who applied to the extension phase were accepted.
MATS aims to accelerate researchers who will:
MATS alumni have gone on to publish safety research, join alignment organizations, including Anthropic and MIRI, and found an alignment research lab. You can read more about MATS alumni here.
In stage one, applicants apply to one or more tracks (broad research areas): Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, System Security, Biosecurity, and Founding & Field-Building. In stage two, advancing applicants choose specific streams within those tracks, each led by one or more mentors with their own research agenda. You can view this list as a grid here.
We are excited to supervise projects:
Essential knowledge:
Essential experience:
Desired experience:
Bonus:
Lee's stream will focus primarily on improving mechanistic interpretability methods for reverse-engineering neural networks.
Mentorship looks like a 1 h weekly meeting by default with approximately daily slack messages in between. Usually these meetings are just for updates about how the project is going, where I’ll provide some input and steering if necessary and desired. If there are urgent bottlenecks I’m more than happy to meet in between the weekly interval or respond on slack in (almost always) less than 24h. We'll often run daily standup meetings if timezones permit, but these are optional.
As an indicative guide (this is not a score sheet), in no particular order, I evaluate candidates according to:
In the past cohort I chose a diversity of candidates with varying strengths and I think this worked quite well. Some mentees were outstanding in particular dimensions, others were great all rounders.
In general I'd like projects in my stream should at least be conceptually informed by parameter decomposition, manifolds, and minimum description length framings of interpretability, if not build on them directly.
Scholars and I will discuss projects and come to a consensus on what feels like a good direction. I will not tell scholars to work on a particular direction, since, in my experience, intrinsic motivation to work on a particular direction is important for producing good research.
The SL5 Task Force will build out a prototype SL5 datacenter this year together with frontier AI labs. This will be a massive research and engineering project with many avenues for spinning out new organizations and research programs. This project is urgent due to this technology being needed in the next 1 to 2 years.
We will meet at least 1h a week synchronously and communicate daily via standard-ups on slack. I typically respond within a few hours for additional feedback and within 1-3 days for indepth code or other review. Scholars can also schedule adhoc calls with me or my co-mentor Luis if they're stuck.
You may have the option to join company meetings and work from our offices 1+ days a week to collaborate with SL5 engineering staff.
This stream is best for strong technical IC's looking to move into research lead / tech lead / org lead positions in the future.
Essential:
Preferred:
Not a good fit:
This stream is primarily interested in mentoring projects in biosecurity that either (1) create rigorous threat models of AI biological misuse or (2) create benchmarks and tools that allow us to evaluate and mitigate these risks, as well as verifying that companies are taking suitable precautions.
Typically, this would include weekly meetings, detailed comments on drafts, and asynchronous messaging.
For threat modeling work: Skeptical mindset, transparent reasoning, analytical
For evaluations, mitigations, and verification work: LLM engineering skills (e.g., agent orchestration), biosecurity knowledge
Mentor(s) will talk through project ideas with scholar
This stream focuses on identifying tractable policy and technical interventions to gradual disempowerment, focusing on economic disempowerment and the intelligence curse. Possible project areas include:
We’ll meet 1:1 for 30 minute slots twice a week, once with each mentor. We’ll be active on Slack (default to over-slacking us), and can do quick ad-hoc calls as well. Once a week, we expect you to have some artifact that we will give feedback on.
We're excited about applications from a variety of backgrounds. Use the list below as general guidance, not as an exhaustive list.
Essential:
Preferred:
Nice to haves:
We provide three projects as options we are excited about, but they are not inclusive of all ideas. During the application process, we will ask potential mentees to either a) sharpen these proposals into a more specific question incorporating their own interests, or b) propose their own projects.
We expect fellows to come in with inner conviction towards a starting point that fits within the above themes, and expect that the best work in this stream will come from self-directed fellows pursuing their own research taste. However, we will require sign off to pursue a project and may require fellows to shift scope if they move outside the target area.
This stream focuses on critical challenges in AI safety and alignment, including risks from automating AI research, bottlenecks to recursive self-improvement, and the automation of safety and alignment research. Priority topics also include AGI privacy, measuring long-horizon agentic capabilities, developing new alignment methods, and advancing the science of post-training.
I usually spend at least 30 min per week in one-one-one meetings with my mentees. We can also discuss longer time slots if necessary. Besides these time slots, I try to be as responsive as possible over Slack (>2 comprehensive responses per day) and read relevant papers between weekly meetings.
I'm looking for the following skills:
I would prefer to set the overall direction, but I will listen closely to scholars about their preferences within a broad direction. Converging on a particular topic is expected to be a collaborative process.
We research early training interventions that shape a model's psychological core such that alignment generalizes through subsequent training. Potential projects span developing evaluations of model psychology, developing training interventions, experimenting with seeding the chain-of-thought patterns of the model, and methods for making models active participants in their own alignment.
By default, 1 hour weekly meetings, ideally in person in Berkeley. One day a week I will be in Berkeley and can have quite high touch in person chats throughout the day. The rest of the week I expect to be somewhat accessible on Slack and should be able to respond to messages within a few hours. I expect a lot of discussion on top of artifacts—experiment proposals, plots, slides with interim results. I can jump on quick calls to unblock, but my availability for this can change depending on the day.
Essential:
Preferred:
Not expected to be particularly helpful:
We are happy to work with fellows in the first week to jointly develop a project. We (at least Felix) are happy to be high touch during this phase and to discuss and brainstorm potential projects.
MATS Research phase provides scholars with a community of peers.

Scholars work out of a shared office and are supported by the Community Team.
MATS alumni report that the connections with peers that they made during MATS have had the largest impact on them years later. Our full-time Community Team works to facilitate these connections and also provide general well-being support. Weekly lightning talks, scholar-led discussion groups, game nights, and outings to SF are some examples of MATS events.