Bryce Cai works on bio evaluations as part of SecureBio's AI team. Cai is a co-author of ABC-Bench, a suite of tasks measuring the biosecurity-relevant capabilities of AI agents on DNA design and laboratory automation.
Leonie is a Policy Director at Secure AI Project. Previously, she co-led the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice taskforce at the European AI Office, and before that had various roles at the Centre for the Governance of AI, the Institute for Law & AI, and the German government. Leonie is affiliated with the University of Berkeley, and has a background in law.
Jacob Kaffey is a Research Engineer at SecureBio with a background in Genetics and Computer Science, specializing in applying machine learning to healthcare. Diverse experience in data engineering, MLOps, and industry research.
Lucius Bushnaq is a Research Scientist at Goodfire.
He works on parameter decomposition methods for interpretability, such as Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition, Stochastic Parameter Decomposition, and adVersarial Parameter Decomposition. Alongside this, he works on learning theory and the theory behind interpretability, for example theoretical frameworks for computation in superposition and connections between singular learning theory and algorithmic information theory.
Previously, Lucius was a member of the interpretability team at Apollo Research, where he worked on the Local Interaction Basis and degeneracy in the loss landscape. He holds a PhD in physics.
Buck is the CEO of Redwood Research.
Ethan Perez is a researcher at Anthropic, where he leads a team working on AI control, adversarial robustness, and other areas of AI safety research. His interests span many areas of LLM safety; he's previously led work on sleeper agents, red-teaming language models with language models, developing AI safety via debate using LLMs, and demonstrating and improving unfaithfulness in chain of thought reasoning. Read more on his website.
Sam leads the Cognitive Oversight subteam of Anthropic's Alignment Science team. Their goal is to be able to oversee AI systems not based on whether they have good input/output behavior, but based on whether there's anything suspicious about the cognitive processes underlying those behaviors. For example, one in-scope problem is "detecting when language models are lying, including in cases where it's difficult to tell based solely on input/output". His team is interested in both white-box techniques (e.g. interpretability-based techniques) and black-box techniques (e.g. finding good ways to interrogate models about their thought processes and motivations). For more flavor on this research direction, see his post here.
Neel leads the mechanistic interpretability team at Google DeepMind, trying to use the internals of models to understand them better, and use this to make them safer - eg detecting deception, understanding concerning behaviours, and monitoring deployed systems for harmful behaviour.
Since mid 2024, Neel has become more pessimistic about ambitious mechanistic interpretability, and more optimistic that pragmatic approaches can add a lot of value. He's doing less work on basic science, and working more on model biology work, and work applying interpretability to real-world safety problems like monitoring.
He has spent far too much time having MATS scholars, and has about 50 alumni - he's excited to take on even more!
Marius Hobbhahn is the CEO of Apollo Research, where he also leads the monitoring team. Apollo is an AI safety research organization focused on scheming, evals and control/monitoring. He is a TIME100 in AI2025 recipient. Prior to starting Apollo, Marius did a PhD in Bayesian ML and worked on AI forecasting at Epoch.
Fabien Roger is an AI safety researcher at Anthropic and previously worked at Redwood Research. Fabien’s research focuses on AI control and dealing with alignment faking.
The MATS Program is a 10-week research fellowship designed to train and support emerging researchers working on AI alignment, transparency and security. Fellows collaborate with world-class mentors, receive dedicated research management support, and join a vibrant community in Berkeley focused on advancing safe and reliable AI. The program provides the structure, resources, and mentorship needed to produce impactful research and launch long-term careers in AI safety.
MATS mentors are leading researchers from a broad range of AI safety, alignment, governance, field-building and security domains. They include academics, industry researchers, and independent experts who guide scholars through research projects, provide feedback, and help shape each scholar’s growth as a researcher. The mentors represent expertise in areas such as:
Key dates
Application:
The main program will then run from September 28th to December 4th, with the extension phase for accepted fellows beginning in December.
MATS accepts applicants from diverse academic and professional backgrounds - from machine learning, mathematics, and computer science to policy, economics, physics, cognitive science, biology, and public health, as well as founders, operators, and field-builders without traditional research backgrounds. The primary requirements are strong motivation to contribute to AI safety and evidence of technical aptitude, research potential, or relevant operational experience. Prior AI safety experience is helpful but not required.
Applicants submit a general application, applying to various tracks (Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Systems Security, Biosecurity, Founding & Field-Building.
In stage 2, applicants apply to streams within those tracks as well as completing track specific evaluations.
After a centralized review period, applicants who are advanced will then undergo additional evaluations depending on the preferences of the streams they've applied to before doing final interviews and receiving offers.
For more information on how to get into MATS, please look at this page.