Kristian Rönn is the CEO and co-founder of Lucid Computing and a co-founder and board member of Normative. He has a background in mathematics, philosophy, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Before he started Normative, he worked at the University of Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute on issues related to global catastrophic risks.
Mary is a research scientist on the Frontier Safety Loss of Control team at DeepMind, where she works on AGI control (security and monitoring). Her role involves helping make sure that potentially misaligned, internally deployed models cannot cause severe harm or sabotage, even if they wanted to. Previously, she has worked on dangerous capability evaluations for scheming precursor capabilities (stealth and situational awareness) as well as catastrophic misuse capabilities.
David Lindner is a Research Scientist on Google DeepMind's AGI Safety and Alignment team where he works on evaluations and mitigations for deceptive alignment and scheming. His recent work includes MONA, a method for reducing multi-turn reward hacking during RL, designing evaluations for stealth and situational awareness, and helping develop GDM's approach to deceptive alignment. Currently, David is interested in studying mitigations for scheming, including CoT monitoring and AI control. You can find more details on his website.
Miles Wang is a researcher at OpenAI whose interests span alignment, evaluations, reasoning, and science. Wang studied computer science at Harvard before joining OpenAI in March 2024.
Arthur Conmy is a Member of Technical Staff at Anthropic. His interests are in automating interpretability, finding circuits and making model internals techniques useful for AI Safety, particularly with Sparse Autoencoders. Previously, he worked at Google DeepMind and Redwood Research (and did the MATS Program!).
Fynn Heide is Executive Director of the Safe AI Forum. Previously, Heide researched AI policy in China as a research scholar at the Centre for the Governance of AI.
Eric Neyman is a researcher at the Alignment Research Center (ARC), which is working on a systematic and theoretically grounded approach to mechanistic interpretability. Before joining ARC, he was a PhD student at Columbia University, where he researched algorithmic Bayesian epistemology.
He He is an associate professor at New York University. She is interested in how large language models work and potential risks of this technology.
Alan is Head of Autonomous Systems & Control at the UK AI Security Institute, where he works on empirical AI control and monitoring. He co-authored RepliBench, an evaluation suite measuring autonomous-replication capabilities in language-model agents.
Alexis is the co-founder and CEO of Asymmetric Security. He was previously an AI security fellow at RAND and part of the founding team of GovAI.
The MATS Program is a 10-week research fellowship designed to train and support emerging researchers working on AI alignment, transparency and security. Fellows collaborate with world-class mentors, receive dedicated research management support, and join a vibrant community in Berkeley focused on advancing safe and reliable AI. The program provides the structure, resources, and mentorship needed to produce impactful research and launch long-term careers in AI safety.
MATS mentors are leading researchers from a broad range of AI safety, alignment, governance, field-building and security domains. They include academics, industry researchers, and independent experts who guide scholars through research projects, provide feedback, and help shape each scholar’s growth as a researcher. The mentors represent expertise in areas such as:
Key dates
Application:
The main program will then run from September 28th to December 4th, with the extension phase for accepted fellows beginning in December.
MATS accepts applicants from diverse academic and professional backgrounds - from machine learning, mathematics, and computer science to policy, economics, physics, cognitive science, biology, and public health, as well as founders, operators, and field-builders without traditional research backgrounds. The primary requirements are strong motivation to contribute to AI safety and evidence of technical aptitude, research potential, or relevant operational experience. Prior AI safety experience is helpful but not required.
Applicants submit a general application, applying to various tracks (Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Systems Security, Biosecurity, Founding & Field-Building.
In stage 2, applicants apply to streams within those tracks as well as completing track specific evaluations.
After a centralized review period, applicants who are advanced will then undergo additional evaluations depending on the preferences of the streams they've applied to before doing final interviews and receiving offers.
For more information on how to get into MATS, please look at this page.