No items found.

Luca Righetti

This stream is primarily interested in mentoring projects in biosecurity that either (1) create rigorous threat models of AI biological misuse or (2) create benchmarks and tools that allow us to evaluate and mitigate these risks, as well as verifying that companies are taking suitable precautions.

Stream overview

Potential example projects for this stream include:

  • Threat Model: What do inference compute trends imply for how fast dangerous biological capabilities may proliferate and become harder to monitor?
  • Evaluations: Formalizing "scientific ideation in an empirical field" in a manner that allows one to assess human and LLM-generated hypotheses for novelty, plausibility, etc.
  • Mitigations: Developing a way to more richly assess and describe the "blast radius" or "collateral damage" of efforts to remove-in-pretraining or unlearn material from LLMs
  • Verification: How are we better able to standardize and compare the effectiveness of classifiers from different AI companies and assess how much they reduce misuse risk?

Mentors

No items found.

Mentorship style

Typically, this would include weekly meetings, detailed comments on drafts, and asynchronous messaging.

Fellows we are looking for

For threat modeling work: Skeptical mindset, transparent reasoning, analytical

For evaluations, mitigations, and verification work: LLM engineering skills (e.g., agent orchestration), biosecurity knowledge

Mentorship will be a collaboration between me and my team at GovAI. The specifics depend on the candidate and project.

I am based in Berkley -- and some of my team is based in London.

Project selection

Mentor(s) will talk through project ideas with scholar

Streams

The Winter 2027 cohort offers a wide range of research streams led by experts across AI alignment, interpretability, governance, and safety. Each stream provides its own research agenda, methodology, and mentorship focus.

Grand Rapids
Agent Foundations
Washington, D.C.
Compute Infrastructure, Policy & Governance, Security
London
Dangerous Capability Evals, Compute Infrastructure, Policy & Governance, Strategy & Forecasting
Washington, D.C.
Compute Infrastructure, Security
London
Control, Monitoring
London
Control, Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Model Organisms, Monitoring
SF Bay Area
Security, Dangerous Capability Evals
SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals
Boston
Adversarial Robustness, Policy & Governance, Red-Teaming, Safeguards
New York City
Control, Scalable Oversight, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Monitoring
SF Bay Area
Policy & Governance
SF Bay Area
Control, Monitoring, Dangerous Capability Evals
SF Bay Area
Security, Compute Infrastructure
London
Interpretability
London
Scheming & Deception, Dangerous Capability Evals, Control, Red-Teaming
SF Bay Area
Dangerous Capability Evals, Red-Teaming, Model Organisms, Control, Monitoring
Toronto
Interpretability
London
Control, Monitoring, Safeguards, Dangerous Capability Evals, Scheming & Deception
Chicago
Biorisk, Security, Safeguards
SF Bay Area
Interpretability, Agent Foundations