The Summer 2026 program will run from June through August. It will be largest MATS program to date with 120 fellows and 100 mentors. Fellows will be connected with mentors or organizational research groups, such as Anthropic's Alignment Science team, UK AISI, Redwood Research, ARC, and LawZero, to collaborate on a research project over the summer. Some fellows will be offered a 6+ month extension to continue this collaboration.
Applications are now open. Apply by June 7th.

Key dates for the application and admissions timeline
General Application (May 12th to June 7th)
Applicants fill out a general application to individual tracks which should take 1-2 hours. Applications are due by June 7th EOD AOE.
Additional Evaluations (June 7th to late July)
After an initial evaluation, applicants will apply to individual streams listed below. Additionally, applicants undergo a variety of track specific evaluations including coding tests, writing reviews, work tests, and interviews. Which evaluations you will undergo depend on the tracks, streams and mentors you apply to.
Admissions Decisions (Late July to early August)
Selected applicants are notified of their acceptance and anticipated mentor later in the application cycle.
.png)
The main program takes place from September 28th to December 4th of 2026. It is an intensive research phase, where fellows work full time on a research project in AI alignment, security, field-building, or governance. Fellows' research directions will typically be chosen through a collaborative process with their mentors, and fellows are expected to develop their independent research direction as the program continues.
While mentor support will vary depending on the project and mentors, mentors are expected to spend at least 1 hour/week working with each of their scholars, and some spend much more time. Scholars will also receive support from MATS’s Research Management team, who help to scope out and structure research direction. Depending on which stream you participate in, you may collaborate with other fellows in your stream.
By the middle of the program, fellows will be expected to write a report on their projects’ threat model, theory of change, and project deliverables. At the end of the program scholars will be expected to have a tangible research output. In past cohorts, this has involved presenting at a fellow symposium on work conducted over the course of MATS.
Educational seminars and workshops will be held 2-3 times per week. Previously, speakers have included Buck Shlegeris from Redwood Research, Adam Gleave from FAR AI, Neel Nanda from Google DeepMind, William Saunders from OpenAI, Andrew Critch from CHAI, Lennart Heim from GovAI, Ajeya Cotra from Open Philanthropy, and more.
The extension phase starts in December of 2026, soon after the end of the main program. Fellows who demonstrate promise as independent researchers during the main program can apply for the MATS extension phase. Acceptance into the extension is based on mentor evaluation and MATS review of proposed research.
In recent cohorts, ~80% of fellows who apply have been accepted. The extension phase offers a default additional 6-months of funding, with the ability to later apply for a 6-month continuation.
Extension fellows primarily work from the MATS London or Berkeley offices, with the possibility of working from other AI safety hubs or fully remotely.For accepted extension fellows, MATS arranges funding for stipends and housing ($7,680/month), as well as for compute ($8,000/mo), creating a seamless transition into this advanced phase of the program.
MATS aims to accelerate researchers who will:
MATS alumni have gone on to publish safety research, join alignment organizations, including Anthropic and MIRI, and found an alignment research lab. You can read more about MATS alumni here.
In stage one, you apply to one or more tracks (broad research areas): Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, System Security, Biosecurity, and Founding & Field-Building. In stage two, advancing applicants choose specific streams within those tracks, each led by one or more mentors with their own research agenda. You can view this list as a grid here.
Additional streams will be added over the course of May.
We will continue working on black-box monitors for scheming in complex agentic settings, building on the success of the previous stream.
See here for details.
We have two weekly 60-minute calls by default. Since everyone will work on the same project, these calls will be with all participants of the stream. I respond on slack on a daily basis for asynchronous messages. Scholars will have a lot of freedom for day-to-day decisions and direction setting. In the best case, you will understand the project better than me after a few weeks and have a clear vision for where it should be heading. I recommend scholars focus 100% of their work time on the project and not pursue anything on the side. I think this way people will learn the most in MATS.
You will work on subprojects of black box monitoring. See here for details.
AI control focussed stream, probably running in-person in London.
I'm pretty hands-off. I expect scholars to fully take charge of the project, and update / consult me as needed. I do want my scholars to succeed, and am happy to advise on project direction, experiment design, interpreting results, decision-making / breaking ties, or getting unstuck.
During the program, we'll meet once a week to go through any updates / results, and your plans for the next week. I'm also happy to comment on docs, respond on Slack, or have additional ad hoc meetings when useful.
I'll propose ~5 projects for scholars to red-team, flesh out and decide on one to own. I'm also open to scholar-proposed projects if they sound promising; I'd just be less useful as an advisor.
Escalation risks from state perceptions of AI capability, AI-enabled targeting, AI-enabled decision manipulation, and the impact of AI integration into nuclear command and control.
Mentorship will mostly consist of calls, sorting through research ideas and providing feedback. I'll be up to review papers, and potentially to meet in person depending on timing.
Looking for intellectually curious and honest scholars, with some background on topics related to national security, game theory, or AI-enabled military and influence capabilities.
I'll talk through project ideas with scholar, or the scholar can pick from a list of projects
This stream will focus on the science and development of model evaluations, especially monitorability and alignment evals.
I'll meet with scholars 2x/week each. I'll also be generally available async and potentially for code review.
Various profiles could be a good fit.
Wanted:
Some of the following would be great but not essential:
I'll provide a list of possible projects to pick from, and talk through the options before making a decision.
Scholars can also suggest their own projects.
Research papers (technical governance or ML) related to evaluating and mitigating dangerous AI capabilities, with a focus on what's actionable and relevant for AGI companies
I like to get daily standup messages about progress that has made on the project, and I'm happy to provide some quick async feedback on new outputs. I'll also have weekly meetings. I'm based in Constellation in Berkeley.
Good writers/researchers who can work independently and autonomously! I'm looking for scholars who can ship a meaningful research output end-to-end and ideally have prior experience in writing relevant papers.
I may assign a project, have you pick from a list of projects, or talk through project ideas with you.
I'm interested in empirical projects that improve our ability to evaluate model capabilities or enable to understand or evaluate model monitorability. An ideal project culminates in a research output (conference/Arxiv paper or research blogpost with artifacts).
Time commitments: I expect to not be able to spend more than 5 hours on any week.
Meetings: I expect to have project meetings weekly for about an hour, where we chat about your results from last week, the planned next steps, any blockers or uncertainties. We'll have a monthly overall project check-in about broader progress towards overall goals.
Help outside of meetings: I am available to provide some help most weeks outside of the meeting, but by and large I expect mentees to be self-directed and self-sufficient in solving problems.
An ideal mentee has a strong AI research (software engineering is a plus) background. It's important that they are self-motivated and can make weekly progress with little intervention. If you are interested in working on non-concretely scoped projects, I would expect mentees to have the ability to write well-scoped project proposals, with realistic planned milestones and deliverables. Evidence of successful projects here would be very helpful in evaluating this.
A mentee can be a PhD student and they can work on a paper that will be part of their thesis.
I will talk through project ideas with the scholar
Making society safe from AI doesn't just mean making safe AI: we're figuring out how to uplift human collective intelligence, manage a highly multiagent world, improve foresight and institutional competence, ideally learning how to make best positive use of frontier AI systems as we go. FLF has a small, sharp team of researchers with a wide network, and we're looking to nurture new and missing approaches to minimising large-scale risks while steering to a flourishing future.
Willing to devote a few hours per week to this - I'll keep a 30m or 1h slot available weekly, and interact on Slack circa daily. Some closer projects might be much more interactive.
Depends a lot on direction. Ideally be able to make proposals and dig into things somewhat independently. Be good at explaining your thinking, and able+willing to teach me things!
For collective intelligence/human reasoning, I'd usually want someone very familiar with software production, at least skilled in software development or in product management and prototyping. Other candidates with great vision can succeed here if they're able to work with complementary talent to get things going.
For foresight, any of: polymathic/multi-STEM/futurism background, deep expertise in bio and/or AI, natsec experience or connections, unusual writer/game dev talent, safety engineering background, other background that you think I might want to hear about.
For multiagent accountability: law, economics, politics, history, or a combination, plus some familiarity with AI and agents.
I'll ask for interests and (if you have them) a proposal or two right away. We'll spend the first week or two iterating that, discussing other options, and maybe trying out little experiments. Likely we'll pick a direction then, but it's also fine if we pivot later.
Projects in this stream will be on AI welfare and moral status; more specifically, on what it takes to be a moral patient and how we can determine whether AI systems meet the conditions. I'm looking for applicants who have ideas about these topics and are motivated to explore them in more detail.
By default, scholars will meet with me online for 1hr/week and I will respond to questions on email/slack.
Scholars should have the following characteristics:
I will talk through project ideas with scholar
MATS Research phase provides scholars with a community of peers.

Scholars work out of a shared office and are supported by the Community Team.
MATS alumni report that the connections with peers that they made during MATS have had the largest impact on them years later. Our full-time Community Team works to facilitate these connections and also provide general well-being support. Weekly lightning talks, scholar-led discussion groups, game nights, and outings to SF are some examples of MATS events.