The Policy and Governance Track supports research on how advanced AI is governed and how it should be governed. As AI capabilities accelerate, many of the hardest problems are no longer purely technical. They involve international coordination, policymaking amid uncertainty, state capacity, regulatory design, and translating safety goals into real-world policies and institutions. Decisions made in the next 6–12 months will shape what labs build, what governments require, and what oversight looks like for years to come.
The track covers a wide range of research areas. Some streams within this track focus on concrete governance mechanisms, including evaluations, standards, safeguards, monitoring systems, and enforcement structures, while others focus on conducting policy and institutional analysis, such as comparative reviews of governance regimes, regulatory frameworks, and international coordination challenges. A separate set of streams engage with broader questions, like how advanced AI may reshape global power dynamics or how governance approaches could meaningfully reduce catastrophic risk.
We are looking for fellows who can reason and write clearly about these topics. Strong candidates in past cohorts have had backgrounds in policy, economics, law, political science, public administration, security studies, philosophy, computer science, forecasting, sociology, history, journalism, and science and technology studies.
Fellows are matched to mentors based on fit, and projects are scoped to produce concrete artifacts (e.g., policy memos, regulatory comments, technical specifications, comparative analyses, and peer-reviewed research) by the end of the program. Target audiences for the work produced in this track span AISI staff, lab governance teams, regulators, standards bodies, and the broader research and policy communities shaping frontier AI governance.
We work to advance technically grounded international coordination to reduce catastrophic risks from frontier AI, with a particular focus on China and US. We translate technical AI safety and governance tools into practical proposals for coordination.
1 hour weekly meetings by default for high-level guidance. We are active on Slack and typically respond within a day for quick questions.
We will provide a shortlist of projects that we are keen for the scholar to work on in Week 1. We'll ask scholars to scope these in the 1st week and make a determination about which project to focus on in Week 2.
This stream will focus on technical AI governance research -- hence the name TAIGR. We will follow an academic collaboration model and produce open research on applied AI safeguards, incidents, laws, and other impactful topics in AI governance.
By default, we should expect to meet 2-3 times per week as a full group, plus ad hoc project-specific meetings.
I will work with MATS scholars to iteratively refine project ideas in whatever area our interests and skills overlap. Above all, project selection will hinge on having a clear (and good) theory of impact.
The MATS Program is a 10-week research fellowship designed to train and support emerging researchers working on AI alignment, transparency and security. Fellows collaborate with world-class mentors, receive dedicated research management support, and join a vibrant community in Berkeley focused on advancing safe and reliable AI. The program provides the structure, resources, and mentorship needed to produce impactful research and launch long-term careers in AI safety.
MATS mentors are leading researchers from a broad range of AI safety, alignment, governance, field-building and security domains. They include academics, industry researchers, and independent experts who guide scholars through research projects, provide feedback, and help shape each scholar’s growth as a researcher. The mentors represent expertise in areas such as:
Key dates
Application:
The main program will then run from September 28th to December 4th, with the extension phase for accepted fellows beginning in December.
MATS accepts applicants from diverse academic and professional backgrounds - from machine learning, mathematics, and computer science to policy, economics, physics, cognitive science, biology, and public health, as well as founders, operators, and field-builders without traditional research backgrounds. The primary requirements are strong motivation to contribute to AI safety and evidence of technical aptitude, research potential, or relevant operational experience. Prior AI safety experience is helpful but not required.
Applicants submit a general application, applying to various tracks (Empirical, Theory, Strategy & Forecasting, Policy & Governance, Systems Security, Biosecurity, Founding & Field-Building.
In stage 2, applicants apply to streams within those tracks as well as completing track specific evaluations.
After a centralized review period, applicants who are advanced will then undergo additional evaluations depending on the preferences of the streams they've applied to before doing final interviews and receiving offers.
For more information on how to get into MATS, please look at this page.